Ambassadors

Jenya Mavromati Panayiotis Karafotias IREL-480-9 For my newlysprint I decided to write roughly the embassadors of Denmark, The United States of America and Uruguay. His Excellency Mr. tom Norring, the embassador of Denmark, was whizz of the ambassadors to come this semester. He decided to decoct his speech not on his untaught but more on the globose financial crisis and how it affected Hellenic economy. He said that even without the crisis the situation in Greece would have been messy. Despite the fact that Maastricht conformity allows the GDP famine in European countries not more than 3% Greece had deficit 6-7%.ambassador said that in 2006-2007 the government of Kostas Karamanlis managed to detain the deficit to the acceptable level, but later(prenominal) in 2008 they failed. Karamanlis hoped that he would be reelected and he promised to restrain the deficit, but people disordered faith in him. Later George Papandreou revealed the new information round the deficit. T he deficit for that prison term was not 8% but 12%. And thus the rescue program was set up by the European Union. So Greece took turn tail to the EU and the IMF. They wanted a unstated cash and the EU and IMF tried to avail with it. Then the restructuring fund was established.The public expenses had to be cut. As ambassador said Greece has peerless of the biggest public administrations and the cutting of public domain expenses will help to decrease the deficit. He also pointed out that 25% of Greek economy is black economy. The only one thing which he said nearly his country was that the Denmark is not the part of Eurozone. 1 of the reasons I enjoyed the speech of Danish ambassador was because he seemed really honest when twaddle of the town rough the topic. When giving his speech, he gave ad hominem examples and continuously referred to the audience.The second ambassador was the ambassador of Uruguay, his Excellency Mr. Jose Luis Pombo Morales. He decided to accent h is speech on his country and its traffic with Greece and other European countries. Mr. Jose Luis Pombo Morales, talked about policy-making system in Uruguay, that it is a interpretive program democraticrepublic with apresidential system. Also, he told us that, the members of government argon elected for a five-year terms by auniversal suffragesystem. Uruguay is aunitary state justice, education, health, security, foreign policy, defence reaction are all administered nationwide.The Executive baron is exercised by thepresidentand a cabinetof 13 ministers. Plus to that, Mr. Ambassador talked about Uruguay as one of the biggest wool and join exporter to the EU countries. Mr. Jose Luis Pombo, told the audience, that Uruguay is one of the most economically developed countries in South America, with a highGDPper capita and the 5second highestquality of spiritedness indexin the world. Uruguay is rated as the 2nd least corrupt country inLatin America(behindChile), although Uruguay sco res easily better than Chile on house servant polls of corruption perception.Its political and turn over conditions are the highest level of freedom on the continent. The third ambassador, I want to talk about, is the ambassador of the United States of America, his Excellency Mr. Daniel Smith. Ambassador focused his speech on Greek- Turkish relations and financial crisis. His speech was very diplomatic, and tried to keep neutrality, when some students asked him questions about problems in Libya and Greek-Turkish conflicts. But, Mr. Smith, gave very clear idea, about the USA and its foreign relations. Also